Obamacare carnage: Kids lose union health coverage ( the Michigan View 11.29.10)

Posted by hpayne on November 29, 2010

Think opposition to insurance mandates only comes from heartless small businesses? That Obamacare saves money? That there aren’t consequences to Big Government mandates?

Then get a load of this headline at The Wall Street Journal today: “Union Drops Health Coverage for Workers’ Children.”

Why? Because Obamacare’s mandates have made it too expensive for the SEIU ” yes, the same SEIU that is one of the biggest liberal union, Democratic lobbies in the country ” to continue insurance coverage of its employees.

“One of the largest union-administered health-insurance funds in New York is dropping coverage for the children of more than 30,000 low-wage home attendants,” reports The Journal. “The union blamed financial problems it said were caused by the state’s health department and new national health-insurance requirements.”

How has Obamacare destroyed insurance coverage for kids?

“New federal health-care reform legislation requires plans with dependent coverage to expand that coverage up to age 26,” (the union) wrote in a letter to members Oct. 22. “Our limited resources are already stretched as far as possible, and meeting this new requirement would be financially impossible.”

“The fund informed its members late last month that their dependents will no longer be covered as of Jan. 1, 2011,” continues The Journal. “Currently about 6,000 children are covered by the benefit fund, some until age 23.”

Ah, those compassionate liberals.

Comments are closed.